In re: THE C.P. HALL COMPANY, Debtor.JAMES SHIPLEY, Plaintiff, v. COONEY & CONWAY CREDITORS, Defendants.JAMES SHIPLEY, Plaintiff, v. O'BRIEN CREDITORS, Defendants., 506 B.R. 751

Summary

HOLDINGS: [1]-Because plaintiff named individual creditors collectively in two groups instead of naming each one individually, he was in violation of Fed. R. Civ. P. 10(a); [2]-Plaintiff had also failed to comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4, as the captions of the summonses showed only the two groups of creditors, the summonses were directed to the two groups instead of the individual creditors, and the summons were served only upon the lawyers for the two groups instead of upon the individual creditors.