WILLIAM SACKMAN III ET AL. v. KELLY A. QUINLAN, EXECUTRIX (ESTATE OF NANCY L. SACKMAN), ET AL., 198 Conn. App. 614

Summary

HOLDINGS: [1]-Plaintiffs did not explain how the trial court acted improperly in utilizing its discretion to allow defendants to file a motion for permission to file a motion for summary judgment; as such, plaintiffs had not presented any persuasive arguments that the trial court abused its discretion in granting defendants permission to file a motion for summary judgment; [2]-Under the terms of a decedent's will, there was no prohibition against taking out a line of credit, as she agreed only to devise the property to plaintiffs, which she did; plaintiffs, therefore, had no basis for their claim to the proceeds of the line of credit.