LYDIA OLSON; MIGUEL PEREZ; POSTMATES, INC., (Successor Postmates LLC); UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA; ROB BONTA, in his capacity as Attorney General of the State of California, Defendants-Appellees., 104 F.4th 66

Summary

HOLDINGS: [1]-2019 Cal. Stat. 2888's differential treatment of app-based work arrangements in the transportation and delivery service industry and app-based work arrangements in other industries survived rational basis review under U.S. Const. amend. XIV and Cal. Const. art. I, § 7, as there were plausible reasons for treating transportation and delivery referral companies differently from other types of referral companies, particularly where the legislature perceived transportation and delivery companies as the most significant perpetrators of the problem it sought to address, i.e., worker misclassification.