EDDY MARTEL, A/K/A MARTEL-RODRIGUEZ; MARY ANNE CAPILLA; JANICE JACKSON-WILLIAMS; AND WHITNEY VAUGHAN, ON BEHALF OF THEMSELVES AND ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, Appellants, vs. HG STAFFING, LLC; AND MEI-GSR HOLDINGS, LLC, D/B/A GRAND SIERRA RESORT, Respondents., 515 P.3d 318

Summary

HOLDINGS: [1]-Dismissing in part employees' claims under Nev. Rev. Stat. §§ 608.016, 608.018, and 608.020 through 608.050 was proper because under the doctrine of analogous limitations, they were governed by a two-year limitations period since they were functionally asserting claims for back pay under Nev. Rev. Stat. § 608.260 and the Minimum Wage Amendment, Nev. Const. art. 15, § 16; [2]-Summary judgment for the employer was proper because the CBA was valid since evidence showed it was ratified by the union and the parties had objectively manifested assent to the agreement, Nev. Rev. Stat. § 608.040 could not be used to recover time-barred wages, and the CBA provided overtime in a sufficiently different manner so as to fall within § 608.018(3)(e)'s exemption.