RODERICK MAGADIA, individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. WAL-MART ASSOCIATES, INC., a Delaware corporation; WALMART INC., a Delaware corporation, Defendants-Appellants., 999 F.3d 668

Summary

HOLDINGS: [1]-The employee lacked U.S. Const. art. III standing to bring a claim under California's Private Attorneys General Act alleging that the employer did not pay adequate compensation for missed meal breaks in violation of Cal. Lab. Code § 226.7(c) because he did not suffer injury himself; [2]-The employee had standing to bring his wage statement claims because a violation of Cal. Lab. Code § 226(a) created a cognizable Article III injury; [3]-The employee was improperly granted judgment on his claim that the employer did not provide adequate pay rate information on its wage statements in violation of § 226(a)(9) because the statute did not require the employer to list the hourly rates of the overtime adjustment on the employees' wage statements.