LETICIA DOMINGO, Appellant, v. BOEING EMPLOYEES' CREDIT UNION, Respondent., 124 Wn. App. 71

Summary

The employee raised several issues on appeal. The trial court did not erroneously considered her supervisor's declaration as evidence because the supervisor's description of what she saw on the videotape was not hearsay, was not offered for the truth of the matter asserted, was offered to show the supervisor's motivation for the decision to reprimand and eventually terminate the employee, and the tape was unavailable, having been taped over in the ordinary course of business. Although the employee had shown she was a woman, was discharged, and was doing satisfactory work, she could not show she was replaced by a member outside the protected class, i.e., a man, because she was replaced by a woman. Her evidence did not show that management's decision to terminate her rather than her Caucasian coworkers was pretext because the violence alleged in both situations was not comparable. She offered no evidence that similarly situated coworkers were allowed to speak their native languages. That...