ANGIODYNAMICS, INC., Plaintiff, Appellee, v. BIOLITEC AG; BIOMED TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS, LTD.; and WOLFGANG NEUBERGER, Defendants, Appellants. BIOLITEC, INC., Defendant., 780 F.3d 420

Summary

HOLDINGS: [1]-Where a medical equipment buyer obtained a judgment against the seller based on an indemnification clause in the parties' supply and distribution agreement, and where the buyer sought to secure payment on the judgment by suing related companies on the basis that they had looted the seller's assets to render it judgment-proof, Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(4) and (6) vacation of a preliminary injunction barring a merger among the seller companies was not warranted because they failed to present any evidence demonstrating that the preliminary injunction warranted extraordinary relief or was void; [2]-Civil contempt sanctions were properly imposed for the failure to comply with the district court's order and the cumulative fine was not excessive because the sellers retained the power to end the fines if they complied with the district court's order.