ACT NOW TO STOP WAR AND END RACISM COALITION, et al., Plaintiffs, v. THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Defendant., 286 F.R.D. 117

Summary

In the context of Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b), in general, a court would grant a motion for reconsideration of an interlocutory order only when the movant demonstrated: (1) an intervening change in the law, (2) the discovery of new evidence not previously available, or (3) a clear error in the first order. The District had made no showing that the court's Opinion merited reconsideration. The District may have disagreed with the court, but it had not explained whether there had been an intervening change in the law, discovery of new evidence, or clear error warranting reconsideration.